Compliance Guide

PDF Accessibility Requirements by Country & State

Understand what level of PDF remediation your organization needs. Laws vary by nation, state, and whether you operate in the public or private sector. This guide covers 20+ countries, 14 US states, and sector-specific recommendations.

$150k+ per violation

US federal ADA penalties up to $150,000 for first violations, $230,464 for subsequent. California adds $4,000 per access barrier. Ireland: imprisonment.

4,000+ lawsuits/year

2,019 US federal accessibility lawsuits in H1 2025 alone—a 37% year-over-year increase. NY (31.6%), FL (24.2%), and CA (18.9%) lead filings.

WCAG 2.1 AA is the baseline

Nearly every national law references WCAG 2.1 Level AA. The UK, Australia, and New Zealand have already adopted WCAG 2.2. The EU is expected to follow in 2026.

EU EAA now in effect

Since Jun 28, 2025 the European Accessibility Act covers private companies across all 27 EU member states. Fines up to 5% of revenue in Italy, €500k in Germany.

International Standards

These standards form the foundation referenced by national laws worldwide. Understanding them is key to choosing the right remediation level.

W3C

WCAG 2.1 Level AA

The global baseline for digital accessibility. 78 success criteria covering perceivable, operable, understandable, and robust content. Referenced by nearly every national law enacted since 2018.

W3C

WCAG 2.2 Level AA

Latest version (Oct 2023) adds 9 new criteria for focus appearance, dragging movements, target size, and accessible authentication. Already adopted by UK, New Zealand, and Australia.

ISO

PDF/UA-1 (ISO 14289-1)

The machine-verifiable standard for accessible PDFs. Requires tagged structure, metadata, alternative text, reading order, and embedded fonts. The format-specific complement to WCAG.

ISO

PDF/UA-2 (ISO 14289-2)

Published 2024, based on PDF 2.0. Adds enhanced table structure, annotation requirements, and MathML support. Not backward-compatible with PDF/UA-1. Adoption is beginning.

ETSI / CEN / CENELEC

EN 301 549

European harmonized standard for ICT accessibility. Chapter 10 explicitly covers non-web documents including PDFs. Incorporates WCAG 2.1 AA. Version 4.1.1 (expected 2026) will adopt WCAG 2.2.

US Access Board

Section 508 (Refreshed)

US federal procurement standard refreshed in 2018 to incorporate WCAG 2.0 AA. Applies to all federal ICT including PDFs. July 2024 GSA update moves toward WCAG 2.1 alignment.

Standards Deep-Dive

WCAG 2.0 vs 2.1 vs 2.2 for PDFs

Different laws reference different WCAG versions. Here is what each adds and which jurisdictions require it.

WCAG 2.0

61 success criteriaReleased Dec 2008

PDF-Relevant Additions

Baseline: alt text, reading order, document structure, color contrast (4.5:1), keyboard access, form labels, page titles.

Referenced By

Section 508, AODA (Ontario), Israel IS 5568, Japan JIS X 8341-3

WCAG 2.1

78 success criteriaReleased Jun 2018

PDF-Relevant Additions

Adds 17 criteria: reflow, text spacing, content on hover/focus, orientation. Improved mobile/touch support relevant to PDF viewers on tablets.

Referenced By

ADA Title II, EU EAA / EN 301 549, Canada ACA, Germany BITV 2.0, France RGAA, most new laws worldwide

WCAG 2.2

86 success criteriaReleased Oct 2023

PDF-Relevant Additions

Adds 9 criteria: focus appearance, dragging movements, target size minimum (2.5.8), accessible authentication, redundant entry. Removes Parsing (4.1.1).

Referenced By

UK Accessibility Regs, New Zealand Standard 1.2, Australia AHRC Guidelines, EN 301 549 v4.1.1 (forthcoming)

WCAG + PDF/UA = full PDF accessibility

WCAG is outcome-based (what users need to be able to do). PDF/UA is format-specific (how the PDF file must be technically structured). Both are needed for complete accessibility. Our Full AI Remediation addresses both simultaneously.

Deadlines

Key Compliance Deadlines

The most important upcoming dates for PDF accessibility compliance worldwide.

Jun 28, 2025Now in effect

EU European Accessibility Act (EAA) in effect

Private sector companies in all 27 EU member states + EEA must comply. Covers e-commerce, banking, telecom, transport. 10+ employees or €2M+ revenue.

Apr 26, 2027Upcoming

ADA Title II — Large US entities

State and local government entities serving 50,000+ people must make all web content and documents, including PDFs, conform to WCAG 2.1 AA.

Apr 26, 2028Upcoming

ADA Title II — Smaller US entities

State and local government entities serving fewer than 50,000 people and special districts must comply with WCAG 2.1 AA.

Dec 5, 2027Upcoming

Canada ACA — Accessibility training

Federally regulated organizations in Canada must complete mandatory accessibility training under the Accessible Canada Act.

Jun 1, 2028Upcoming

Canada ACA — Web content conformance

All web pages and digital content from large and medium federally regulated businesses must conform to CAN/ASC-EN 301 549:2024.

Jun 28, 2030Upcoming

EU EAA — Existing contracts expire

Final deadline for products and services under existing contracts to comply with the European Accessibility Act.

At a Glance

Global Requirements Matrix

Quick-reference table showing what each jurisdiction requires. Scroll horizontally on mobile.

JurisdictionPrimary LawPublicPrivateStandardLevelPDF?Key Deadline
🇺🇸US FederalSection 508WCAG 2.0 AAAA2018 (moving to 2.1)
🇺🇸US State/Local GovADA Title II RuleWCAG 2.1 AAAAApr 2026 / Apr 2027
🇺🇸US Private SectorADA Title IIIWCAG 2.1 AA (de facto)AAOngoing litigation
🇪🇺EU (all 27 states)EAA + WADEN 301 549 / WCAG 2.1 AAAAJun 28, 2025
🇬🇧United KingdomEquality Act + 2018 RegsWCAG 2.2 AAAAIn effect
🇨🇦Canada (Federal)Accessible Canada ActEN 301 549 / WCAG 2.1 AAAAJun 2028
🇨🇦Canada (Ontario)AODAWCAG 2.0 AAAAIn effect
🇦🇺AustraliaDDA 1992WCAG 2.2 AA + PDF/UAAAIn effect (DIS: 2025)
🇩🇪GermanyBITV 2.0 + BFSGEN 301 549 / WCAG 2.1 AAAAJun 28, 2025
🇫🇷FranceRGAA 4.1.2RGAA / WCAG 2.1 AAAAJun 28, 2025
🇮🇹ItalyStanca Act + EAAEN 301 549 / WCAG 2.1 AAAAJun 2025
🇪🇸SpainRD 1112/2018 + EAAEN 301 549 / WCAG 2.1 AAAAJun 2025
🇮🇪IrelandDisability Act + EAAEN 301 549 / WCAG 2.1 AAAAJun 2025
🇳🇴NorwayAnti-Discrimination ActEN 301 549 / WCAG 2.1 AAAAJun 2025
🇸🇪SwedenLag (2023:254)EN 301 549 / WCAG 2.1 AAAAJun 2025
🇮🇱IsraelEqual Rights LawIS 5568 / WCAG 2.0 AAAAGeneralIn effect
🇯🇵JapanJIS X 8341-3:2016WCAG 2.0 equivalentAA rec.GeneralIn effect
🇰🇷South KoreaAnti-Discrimination ActKWCAG 2.1AAGeneralIn effect
🇳🇿New ZealandWeb Standard 1.2WCAG 2.2 AAAAMar 2025
🇮🇳IndiaRPwD Act 2016WCAG 2.0 AAAAGeneralIn effect
🇧🇷BrazilInclusion Lawe-MAG / WCAG 2.0AAGeneralIn effect

“PDF?” column indicates whether the jurisdiction’s law explicitly names PDFs/non-web documents, vs. general digital accessibility coverage. All jurisdictions effectively cover PDFs under their broader accessibility requirements.

By Nation

Detailed Requirements by Country

Click any country to see its specific laws, enforcement bodies, deadlines, and penalties.

🇺🇸

United States (Federal)

WCAG 2.1 AA

Public & Private
Required Standard
WCAG 2.1 AA
Enforcement
DOJ enforcement actions, private lawsuits, OCR complaints. 2,019 federal lawsuits in H1 2025 alone (37% YoY increase).
Deadlines
Title II: Apr 26, 2027 (pop. ≥50k) / Apr 26, 2028 (smaller entities and special districts). Section 508: in effect. Title III: no fixed date but active litigation.
Penalties
Title II/III: up to $150,000 first violation, $230,464 subsequent. Consent decrees, injunctive relief, attorney's fees. 22.6% of 2025 lawsuits targeted sites with accessibility overlay widgets.
🇪🇺

European Union (27 Member States)

EN 301 549 / WCAG 2.1 AA

Public & Private
Required Standard
EN 301 549 / WCAG 2.1 AA
Enforcement
National enforcement bodies in each member state. Market surveillance authorities can remove non-compliant products from market.
Deadlines
EAA: Jun 28, 2025 (now in effect). Existing contracts: until expiry or Jun 28, 2030. WAD: already in effect for public sector. Applies to companies with 10+ employees or €2M+ revenue.
Penalties
Varies by member state: Germany up to €500k, France €5k–€250k per violation, Italy up to 5% of annual revenue, Ireland up to €60k + 18 months imprisonment, Sweden up to SEK 10M (~€900k).
🇬🇧

United Kingdom

WCAG 2.2 AA

Public & Private
Required Standard
WCAG 2.2 AA
Enforcement
Equality and Human Rights Commission (private sector). GDS and CDDO monitoring (public sector). Public monitoring reports.
Deadlines
Public sector: in effect. Private sector: ongoing obligation under Equality Act.
Penalties
Equality Act: unlimited compensation via courts. Accessibility Regs: enforcement notices, public naming. Reputation risk from published monitoring reports.
🇨🇦

Canada

WCAG 2.1 AA (ACA) / WCAG 2.0 AA (AODA)

Public & Private
Applicable Laws
Required Standard
WCAG 2.1 AA (ACA) / WCAG 2.0 AA (AODA)
Enforcement
Accessibility Commissioner (federal). Accessibility Directorate of Ontario (AODA). Administrative monetary penalties.
Deadlines
ACA: web content accessible by Jun 1, 2028. Accessibility training by Dec 5, 2027. AODA: in effect (next compliance report Dec 31, 2026 for 20+ employees).
Penalties
AODA: corporations up to CA$100,000/day; directors/officers up to CA$50,000/day (typical $500–$15k). ACA: administrative monetary penalties framework.
🇦🇺

Australia

WCAG 2.2 AA + PDF/UA

Public & Private
Required Standard
WCAG 2.2 AA + PDF/UA
Enforcement
Australian Human Rights Commission (complaints-based conciliation). Federal Court for contested matters.
Deadlines
DDA: ongoing. DIS for government: Jan 2025 (new services), Jul 2025 (existing). 2025 AHRC Guidelines specifically recommend PDF/UA compliance for all PDF documents.
Penalties
Compensation orders, declarations of unlawful conduct, injunctions. No statutory maximum—damages determined by Federal Court.
🇩🇪

Germany

EN 301 549 / WCAG 2.1 AA

Public & Private
Applicable Laws
Required Standard
EN 301 549 / WCAG 2.1 AA
Enforcement
Federal Monitoring Body for IT Accessibility. Arbitration body for complaints. Mandatory accessibility statements with feedback mechanism.
Deadlines
Public sector: in effect. Private sector (BFSG): Jun 28, 2025 (now in effect). Unique: must provide German Sign Language and Easy Language on home pages.
Penalties
BFSG: up to €500,000. Enforcement orders, market restrictions, product removal.
🇫🇷

France

RGAA 4.1.2 / WCAG 2.1 AA

Public & Private
Required Standard
RGAA 4.1.2 / WCAG 2.1 AA
Enforcement
DINUM (Interministerial Digital Directorate). Annual audit obligations. RGAA includes 106 test criteria adapted to French context.
Deadlines
Public sector: in effect. Private sector (10+ employees): Jun 28, 2025 (now in effect). RGAA applies to PDFs, videos, and infographics.
Penalties
€5,000–€250,000 per violation. Inaccessible PDFs explicitly cited as non-compliant under RGAA.
🇮🇹

Italy

EN 301 549 / WCAG 2.1 AA

Public & Private
Applicable Laws
Required Standard
EN 301 549 / WCAG 2.1 AA
Enforcement
AgID (Agenzia per l'Italia Digitale). Annual compliance reports required. Annual accessibility declarations.
Deadlines
Public sector: in effect. Private €500M+ revenue: since 2022. Broader private sector via EAA: Jun 2025.
Penalties
€5,000–€40,000 per violation. Large companies: up to 5% of annual revenue. €2,500–€30,000 for failure to take corrective action. Contract nullification for non-compliant ICT procurement.
🇪🇸

Spain

EN 301 549 / WCAG 2.1 AA

Public & Private
Applicable Laws
Required Standard
EN 301 549 / WCAG 2.1 AA
Enforcement
Ministry of Economic Affairs. Accessibility compliance reports.
Deadlines
Public sector: in effect. Private (EAA): Jun 28, 2025.
Penalties
Fines from €5,000 to €300,000 depending on severity.
🇳🇱

Netherlands

EN 301 549 / WCAG 2.1 AA

Public & Private
Applicable Laws
  • Besluit digitale toegankelijkheid overheid
  • EAA national transposition
Required Standard
EN 301 549 / WCAG 2.1 AA
Enforcement
Logius (government IT agency). Public digital accessibility dashboards with transparency reporting.
Deadlines
Public sector: in effect. Private (EAA): Jun 28, 2025.
Penalties
Public "comply or explain" reporting. EAA penalties per EU framework.
🇮🇪

Ireland

EN 301 549 / WCAG 2.1 AA

Public & Private
Applicable Laws
Required Standard
EN 301 549 / WCAG 2.1 AA
Enforcement
National Disability Authority. Only EU state with criminal penalties for EAA non-compliance.
Deadlines
Public sector: in effect. Private (EAA): Jun 28, 2025.
Penalties
Up to €60,000 and/or 18 months imprisonment. Daily fines up to €1,000 for ongoing non-compliance. The only EU member state with criminal penalties.
🇳🇴

Norway

EN 301 549 / WCAG 2.1 AA

Public & Private
Applicable Laws
Required Standard
EN 301 549 / WCAG 2.1 AA
Enforcement
Norwegian Digitalisation Agency (Digdir). Active monitoring and testing programs.
Deadlines
In effect since 2014 (new websites), 2021 (all existing). EEA obligations: Jun 2025.
Penalties
Coercive fines. Proposed updates: up to 4% of annual turnover.
🇸🇪

Sweden

EN 301 549 / WCAG 2.1 AA

Public & Private
Applicable Laws
  • Lag (2023:254)
  • Discrimination Act
  • Law on Accessibility of Digital Public Services
Required Standard
EN 301 549 / WCAG 2.1 AA
Enforcement
Agency for Digital Government (DIGG). Monitoring and compliance reviews.
Deadlines
Public sector: in effect. Private (EAA): Jun 28, 2025.
Penalties
Up to SEK 10,000,000 (~€900,000). Enforcement orders with financial penalties.
🇩🇰

Denmark

EN 301 549 / WCAG 2.1 AA

Public & Private
Applicable Laws
  • Act no. 801 of 07/06/2022
  • Web Accessibility Act
  • EAA national transposition
Required Standard
EN 301 549 / WCAG 2.1 AA
Enforcement
Danish Agency for Digital Government.
Deadlines
Public sector: in effect. Private (EAA): Jun 28, 2025.
Penalties
Case-by-case (no fixed maximum). Assessed by authorities/courts based on severity.
🇫🇮

Finland

EN 301 549 / WCAG 2.1 AA

Public & Private
Applicable Laws
  • Act on the Provision of Digital Services
  • Government Decrees 179/2023 and 180/2023
  • EAA national transposition
Required Standard
EN 301 549 / WCAG 2.1 AA
Enforcement
Regional State Administrative Agency for Southern Finland.
Deadlines
Public sector: in effect. Private (EAA): Jun 28, 2025.
Penalties
Notices, orders, and conditional fines.
🇯🇵

Japan

JIS X 8341-3 (WCAG 2.0 equivalent)

Public & Private
Applicable Laws
  • JIS X 8341-3:2016
  • Act for Eliminating Discrimination against Persons with Disabilities
Required Standard
JIS X 8341-3 (WCAG 2.0 equivalent)
Enforcement
Voluntary compliance for private sector. Government guidelines mandate for public sites. Reasonable accommodation obligation since Apr 2024.
Deadlines
Government: in effect. Private: reasonable accommodation since Apr 2024. JIS X 8341-3 cannot update until ISO/IEC 40500 (ISO WCAG) is updated.
Penalties
Published non-compliance for government. Private sector: no direct fines but legal liability under anti-discrimination law.
🇰🇷

South Korea

KWCAG 2.1 (aligned with WCAG)

Public & Private
Required Standard
KWCAG 2.1 (aligned with WCAG)
Enforcement
Ministry of Science and ICT. National Information Society Agency testing. Corrective orders with penalties.
Deadlines
Government and large corporations: in effect. SMEs: phased.
Penalties
Administrative fines up to 30 million KRW (~$22,000) for non-compliance with corrective orders. Public disclosure.
🇮🇱

Israel

IS 5568 (WCAG 2.0 AA)

Public & Private
Applicable Laws
Required Standard
IS 5568 (WCAG 2.0 AA)
Enforcement
Commission for Equal Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Active litigation. Applies to every service offered to the public.
Deadlines
In effect since 2017 for websites. Ongoing for digital documents.
Penalties
Statutory damages up to 50,000 NIS (~$13,500) per aggrieved party. Fines, injunctions, and civil litigation.
🇳🇿

New Zealand

WCAG 2.2 AA

Public Sector
Applicable Laws
Required Standard
WCAG 2.2 AA
Enforcement
Department of Internal Affairs. Government Chief Digital Officer. Published compliance monitoring.
Deadlines
Standard 1.2: effective Mar 17, 2025. PDFs must be accompanied by accessible HTML versions meeting WCAG 2.2 AA.
Penalties
Compliance monitoring reports. Human Rights complaints for discrimination. Legal and reputational consequences.
🇮🇳

India

WCAG 2.0 AA

Public & Private
Applicable Laws
Required Standard
WCAG 2.0 AA
Enforcement
Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities. Complaints mechanism.
Deadlines
Government: in effect. Private: reasonable accommodation obligation.
Penalties
Fines up to ₹1 lakh (~$1,200). Court orders for compliance.
🇧🇷

Brazil

e-MAG (WCAG 2.0 based)

Public & Private
Applicable Laws
Required Standard
e-MAG (WCAG 2.0 based)
Enforcement
Public Ministry. Federal prosecutors. Courts.
Deadlines
Government: in effect. Private: ongoing under Inclusion Law.
Penalties
Administrative fines, judicial orders, mandatory remediation.
US States

US State-Level Requirements

Beyond federal ADA requirements, many states have additional digital accessibility laws. California and New York extend requirements to the private sector with statutory damages.

StateLaw / RegulationStandardApplies ToKey Notes
CaliforniaUnruh Civil Rights Act (Civ. Code 51) / Gov. Code 7405WCAG 2.1 AA (via case law)Public & PrivateStatutory damages up to $4,000 per offense with no cap on violations. Highest lawsuit volume state (18.9% of federal ADA cases). Jan 2025 amendments expand enforcement. Applies to any business operating in CA.
New YorkS3114A (signed Dec 2023) / NY Human Rights LawWCAG 2.2Public & Private#1 ADA lawsuit state (31.6% of all filings). S3114A requires state agencies to meet WCAG 2.2 (effective Jun 2024). NY Human Rights Law extends to private sector.
IllinoisIITAA 2.1 (Information Technology Accessibility Act)WCAG 2.1Public SectorUpdated from original IITAA. State agencies and universities required to comply. 746% increase in ADA lawsuits in 2025. Broadest state IT accessibility mandate.
ColoradoHB 21-1110 + SB 23-244WCAG 2.1 AAPublic SectorState and local government, K-12 institutions. Non-compliance is a civil rights violation. Covers employee-facing content, not just public. OIT amended rules May 2025.
ConnecticutCGS §4d-4 / Universal Website Accessibility PolicyWCAG-basedPublic SectorState agencies required to make websites accessible. Policy requires headings, structure, plain backgrounds, and transcriptions.
MinnesotaState Digital Accessibility Standard (updated Jul 2024)WCAG 2.1Public SectorUpdated July 2024. Requires accessible documents and websites for all state executive branch agencies.
VirginiaHB2541 (ITAA update)Updated accessibility standardsPublic SectorState agencies + vendors. Requires vendors to provide Accessibility Conformance Reports (ACRs). VITA IT Accessibility Standard COV ITRM 504-02.
MarylandIT Nonvisual Access Standards + SB0617Latest WCAG versionPublic SectorSB0617 specifically addresses K-12 public school educational content accessibility. Strong nonvisual access requirements for IT procurement.
TexasTAC §206.70 / §213Section 508 / WCAG 2.0 AAPublic SectorState government and higher education. Department of Information Resources oversight. Additional criteria for webcasts, applets, and plug-ins.
MichiganDigital Accessibility StandardWCAG 2.1 AAPublic SectorExecutive branch agencies. Covers software, websites, and digital reports including PDFs.
MassachusettsEnterprise IT Accessibility PolicyWCAG 2.1 AAPublic SectorExecutive branch agencies. Covers software, websites, and digital reports.
WashingtonUSER-01 Accessibility Policy (OCIO)WCAG 2.1 AAPublic SectorAll state agencies. Agencies must have IT Accessibility Plans. Statewide accessibility policy for public-facing and internal IT.
FloridaSection 282.603, Florida StatutesWCAG 2.0 AA / Section 508Public SectorState agency websites must comply. Florida is #2 state for ADA Title III lawsuits (24.2% of filings) against private businesses.
OregonORS 276A.206WCAG 2.0 AA / Section 508Public SectorStatewide accessibility policy for all state agency IT. DAS oversight with compliance reporting.

All 50 states are subject to federal requirements

Even if your state is not listed above, ADA Title II applies to every state and local government entity (deadline: April 2026/2027). ADA Title III applies to private businesses nationwide through litigation—2,019 lawsuits in the first half of 2025 alone. The states listed here have additional state-level requirements beyond federal law.

Public Sector vs. Private Sector

Requirements differ significantly depending on your organization type. Here is what each faces and what we recommend.

Public Sector

Government agencies, public universities, school districts, and publicly funded organizations.

Mandatory compliance with fixed deadlines— ADA Title II requires WCAG 2.1 AA by Apr 2026/2027. Section 508 already in effect for federal agencies.

PDFs explicitly covered— The 2024 DOJ Final Rule explicitly names PDFs, word documents, and spreadsheets as covered content.

All documents— Every public-facing PDF must be accessible. Pre-existing document exceptions are narrow (archived, not currently used for program access).

Procurement rules— Must purchase accessible ICT. Vendors need VPATs. Section 508 applies to all contractor deliverables.

Recommended: Full AI Remediation ($2/page)

Government documents require complete WCAG 2.1 AA compliance including alt text, semantic structure, reading order, and contrast correction. No exceptions for complex documents.

Private Sector

Businesses, corporations, non-profits, and organizations serving the public.

US: litigation-driven— 4,000+ ADA lawsuits/year targeting private companies. No fixed deadline but courts consistently apply WCAG 2.1 AA as the standard.

EU EAA now mandatory— Since Jun 28, 2025, private companies selling in the EU must comply (10+ employees, €2M+ revenue). Covers e-commerce, banking, telecom, transport.

State statutory damages— California Unruh Act: $4k/violation. NY, FL, and IL see the highest filing volumes. Overlays do not protect—22.6% of 2025 lawsuits targeted overlay-equipped sites.

Competitive advantage— Accessible documents expand your audience, improve SEO, and demonstrate commitment to inclusion in RFPs and procurement.

Recommended: Full AI for public docs, Basic for internal

Customer-facing PDFs (marketing, invoices, reports, contracts) need full remediation. Internal-only documents can start with Basic structural fixes at $1/page.

Recommendations by Industry

Different industries face different levels of regulatory pressure and litigation risk. Here is what we recommend for each.

Government / Public Sector

Critical priority

Federal agencies require Section 508. State/local governments face ADA Title II deadlines in 2026–2027. All documents must be fully tagged with alt text, reading order, and semantic structure. No exceptions for PDFs.

Required Standard

WCAG 2.1 AA + PDF/UA

Recommended Tier

Full AI Remediation

Education (Higher Ed & K-12)

Critical priority

DOJ and OCR actively investigate complaints. Course materials, syllabi, and administrative PDFs must be fully accessible. Colorado and Maryland have specific K-12 digital accessibility laws.

Required Standard

WCAG 2.1 AA + Section 504

Recommended Tier

Full AI Remediation

Healthcare

Critical priority

ACA Section 1557 requires accessible health information. Patient forms, insurance documents, and clinical materials must be accessible. ADA Title II/III plus HIPAA data handling requirements.

Required Standard

WCAG 2.1 AA + Section 1557

Recommended Tier

Full AI Remediation

Financial Services & Banking

Critical priority

Banking is explicitly covered by the EU EAA (Jun 2025). Increasing ADA Title III lawsuits in the US. Statements, disclosures, and regulatory filings must be accessible in both jurisdictions.

Required Standard

WCAG 2.1 AA + EU EAA

Recommended Tier

Full AI Remediation

E-Commerce / Retail

High priority

Product catalogs, receipts, and marketing PDFs fall under ADA Title III. Highest volume of private sector lawsuits. California Unruh Act adds $4k/violation statutory damages. EU EAA covers online shopping.

Required Standard

WCAG 2.1 AA

Recommended Tier

Full AI Remediation

Technology / SaaS

High priority

Enterprise customers require VPATs. EU EAA applies to digital services. Government procurement (Section 508) requires accessible documentation. Competitive advantage in RFPs.

Required Standard

WCAG 2.2 AA + VPAT

Recommended Tier

Full AI Remediation

Legal & Professional Services

Medium priority

Client-facing documents should be fully remediated. Internal documents may use Basic structural remediation. Court filings increasingly require accessible formats.

Required Standard

WCAG 2.1 AA

Recommended Tier

Basic or Full AI

Non-Profit Organizations

Medium priority

Federally funded non-profits must comply via Section 504. Annual reports and donor materials should be accessible. Basic remediation may suffice for simple text documents.

Required Standard

WCAG 2.0 AA

Recommended Tier

Basic or Full AI

Which Remediation Level Do You Need?

Match your compliance requirements to the right tier.

Basic Structural

$1/page

Best For

  • Internal-only documents not subject to compliance review
  • Simple text-based PDFs with no images or tables
  • Organizations not yet under compliance deadlines
  • Low-risk documents (meeting minutes, internal memos)
  • Initial compliance triage for large document backlogs

What It Covers

  • Document title and language tags
  • XMP metadata and PDF/UA identifier
  • Tab order correction
  • Bookmark generation
  • Basic content tagging
  • Color space fixes

Not Included

  • AI-generated alt text for images
  • Semantic heading detection
  • Table structure recognition
  • Color contrast correction
  • Reading order optimization
  • Full compliance validation report
Get Started
Recommended for compliance

Full AI Remediation

$2/page

Best For

  • Public-facing government documents (required for ADA Title II)
  • Documents with images, charts, tables, or complex layouts
  • Organizations under ADA, Section 508, EAA, or AODA deadlines
  • Education materials, healthcare documents, financial statements
  • Any document that could face legal challenge or audit
  • EU market: e-commerce, banking, telecom, transport PDFs

What It Covers

  • Everything in Basic, plus:
  • AI alt text generation (GPT-4o Vision)
  • Semantic heading and list detection (Claude AI)
  • Table structure recognition
  • Color contrast correction to 4.5:1 AA ratio
  • Reading order optimization
  • Full compliance validation report
Get Started

Accessibility overlays do not provide compliance protection

22.6% of accessibility lawsuits filed in 2025 targeted websites with overlay widgets installed. The FTC reached a $1M settlement with an overlay provider for misleading compliance claims. Overlays modify the presentation layer but cannot fix underlying document structure issues like missing alt text, incorrect tag trees, or improper reading order in PDFs. True compliance requires document-level remediation.

Start Remediating Today

$2 per page, pay as you go. Remediate your first document in under 60 seconds and see a full compliance report.